The
African Queen
1951
Director: John Huston
Starring: Humphrey Bogart, Katharine
Hepburn
I
shall not mince words: I consider The African Queen a
disappointment. It’s Katharine
Hepburn. It’s Humphrey Bogart. It’s John Huston. It’s got quite a pedigree, and a definite
reputation. It’s on a lot of Best Of
lists. It’s one of those films that I
had huge expectations for. A great classic
film. I was excited about seeing it.
And
then I saw it.
And
had a huge attack of the “mehs.”
Rose
“Rosie” Sayer (Hepburn) is a prim and proper reverend’s sister living and
working in German East Africa in 1914, trying, with her brother, to bring
Christianity to the locals. Charlie
Allnut (Bogart) is a rough and tumble mechanic in the local mine who runs his
boat, the African Queen, up and down the river carrying supplies. When World War I breaks out back in Europe
and German soldiers destroy the local village, Rose’s brother dies leaving her
with no other option than joining up with Allnut on his boat. She decides that Charlie is capable of both
navigating a treacherous river and building torpedoes in order to destroy a
German ship, The Louisa. As the two make
their way together down the river, they encounter many different adventures,
including the blossoming of love.
Look,
The
African Queen is hardly a bad film.
I would never call it a bad film.
But for how much I was anticipating finally getting a chance to see it
and revel in its glory, it came up sorely lacking.
And
I realize that right there, that issue of expectations versus realities, The
African Queen was already set up for a bit of failure on my part. Having such huge expectations meant it would
be quite a feat, living up to them. I’ve
certainly had this experience before, of eager anticipation, only to be let
down. My husband and I have had lengthy
discussions about this (I will always remember that I somewhat enjoyed my time
with The
Scorpion King because I expected it to be utter crap, while he was
disappointed because he thought it might be good).
To
get back to the film, itself, however, it is, as I said, not a bad film. It’s a blend of adventure, comedy, and
romance. Think Indiana Jones-light. But while I will usually be diverted by such
a mixture of genres, it never quite gels for me in The African Queen. The adventure seems too superficial. We get our thrills from a quick episode where
The African Queen runs down the rapids, or an all-too-short sequence when she
drives past a German fort. The tension
has barely had time to develop before it is resolved.
Undercutting
the attempt at adventure is the comedy aspect of the film. A soundtrack full of cheery, happy boop boop
de doo xylophone melodies does nothing whatsoever to convince you of the perils
of our main characters. The comedy
itself is fine, very gentle, very nice, very much based on the opposing
personalities of the two main characters.
We laugh at Rosie emptying the bottles of gin into the river and the
pained expression it gives Charlie. It’s
nice, it’s cute, it’s perfectly acceptable gentle family comedy. It just doesn’t gel with the other parts of
the film for me.
The
romance of The African Queen, the genre which it is best known for, is,
once again, fine. What an awful word,
“fine.” Practically an insult,
really. Like the comedy, the romance is
gentle and family-friendly, and despite that it is so clearly playing off of
the polar opposite personalities of Rosie and Charlie, both characters still
feel too nice and wholesome (yes, even gruff Charlie feels wholesome) to give
their falling in love any kind of desperately needed edge. I don’t necessarily expect “edge” from a
romance in a movie from 1951, but I think of some of the searing heat of film
noir, and I wish there was just a dash of that here. The wooing of Charlie and Rosie does little
to woo me.
Bogart
and Hepburn turn in perfectly acceptable performances. Bogart won his only Oscar for his role as Charlie
Allnut, and I’m alright with that. Do I
think it’s the best Bogart performance I’ve seen? Not even close. (I’m thinking Treasure of the Sierra Madre
and In
a Lonely Place instead) But it’s
more than just a “standard Bogart performance,” if you know what I mean. He doesn’t feel as if he is simply rehashing
his standard film anti-hero in Charlie Allnut.
Hepburn delivers everything I would expect from the character of Rosie:
tough as nails and surprising you at certain turns despite her uptight demeanor. Hepburn was nominated for an Oscar for her
role in this film, and although I am a fan of Katharine Hepburn, I will add
that the Academy got it right (or at least, right-ish) in awarding Vivien Leigh
for Streetcar
Named Desire. While Hepburn’s
performance is definitely good, I would stop short of calling it great.
My
favorite part of The African Queen is the fact that it was, in fact, shot in
Africa. From what I’ve read, the tales
of the filming seem easily more exciting than the actual film itself. The perils of shooting in an exotic location
like that – disease, contaminated water, etc. – were constantly an issue, and
to keep themselves from getting ill, Bogart and Huston were apparently drunk
most of the time. Better to drink
alcohol than contaminated water, they thought.
For her part, Hepburn protested their drunkenness by drinking only water
and getting herself frightfully ill in the process, to the point where she
needed a bucket constantly offscreen to vomit into between takes. But all the misadventures pay off in the
shots of going downstream when it is clearly Bogart and Hepburn actually on a
boat. It is so refreshing to see a film
from 1951 use a minimum of back projection to convince us of foreign
locales. There is some, true, but for
the most part, that boat was actually on that river, and Bogie and Hepburn were
actually on that boat. Cardiff’s
cinematography takes advantage of the real location to produce some very nice
images indeed.
It’s
tough when I have every intention of loving a film and then… I don’t. I suppose it’s not really The
African Queen’s fault. It’s a
fine movie. I was just expecting
something so much more.
Arbitrary
Rating: 6/10
I'm completely with you on how my expectations for a movie can have a large impact on how I perceive it. It's to the point where I try to avoid the hype for a movie I'm looking forward to seeing. I still wasn't successful as recently as last December's The Hobbit. Even though I liked it, I was hoping for more.
ReplyDeleteI liked The African Queen well enough. Like you I didn't get too excited over it. I didn't really buy the romance; it felt a little forced.
I do remember getting a chuckle from one of Bogie's lines. "I expect he'd like the be buried in the shade." Just the way he delivered it, along with the concept of that being a last wish, tickled me.
Expectations can be killer. I was excited for The Hobbit, but upon hearing that Jackson turned one book into a trilogy, I subsequently lowered my expectations. I liked The Hobbit, but it inspired nothing near as great a love in me for it as the Lord of the Rings trilogy did. LotR is magic. The Hobbit is diverting at best. (I do appreciate Richard Armitage, though.)
DeleteI enjoyed Bogie here, most definitely! His Charlie is fun and funny and amusing. I think I'd call it an above average Bogie performance.
Dead on. This is a fine movie, but not the revelation that it's reputation would lead you to believe it is. I don't buy the romance for a second, and that does a lot to kill the mood of the film. Too much of it doesn't work for me for it to be anything other than enjoyable, but not great.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad I'm not the only one who felt a bit underwhelmed by this movie. I was just expecting SO much more than it delivered. The romance never gelled for me either.
Delete